Intermediate Boulderer - Build-up 2 (Power)

Maximum power program for intermediate climbers (V4-V6). 3x per week with focus on strength and neural adaptation.

At a Glance

Time per Session

60-90 min/session

Frequency

3x per week

Equipment

Gym only

Total Sessions

12 workouts

9.5

Exceptional Effectiveness

Top 5% of all training programs

Based on scientific research, community feedback, and proven results from climbers at your level.

Focus Areas:

power

maximum-strength

neural-adaptation

Program Overview

Build-up 2 (Power) program for Intermediate Boulderers (V4-V6). This 3-day per week program maximizes power output through limit bouldering, campus training, and maximum strength protocols. Includes proper progression and deload weeks.

What You'll Get

✓4 weeks structured training plan with detailed workout instructions
✓Week-by-week progression to safely build your climbing performance
✓Progress tracking guidelines to measure your improvements

Target Audience

✅ Ideal For

• Those wanting to improve power
• Can train 3x per week
• Committed to a 4 weeks training cycle

⚠️ Not Recommended If

• Currently dealing with climbing injuries
• Unable to commit to the required training frequency

Training Topics Trending This Week

What the community is discussing right now

•
Finger Training Protocols
2+ mentions
•
Competition Preparation
2+ mentions
•
Injury Management
2+ mentions
•
Injury Prevention
2+ mentions
•
Board Climbing
2+ mentions
•
Board/System Training Frequency
1+ mentions

Success Stories

Real results from climbers in the community

Program: 2+ year project completion

Result: Funky Dunky 14a after 250+ attempts

⏱️ Over 2 years

• First of grade, demonstrates extreme persistence

Program: Campus board training

Result: Improved technique and enjoyment

⏱️ Ongoing

• Using campus board for fun rather than strict training

Program: 4 months bouldering progression

Result: V7-V8 range achievement

📈 V7-V8

⏱️ 4 months

• 16-year-old with natural talent but seeking structured training

Common Questions

Questions the community is asking about this topic

**"How do I structure lead sessions for 5.12 breakthrough?"** - Endurance vs. projecting balance for grade progression
**"Is 2x weekly hangboarding too much with board climbing?"** - Volume management and injury prevention
**"Why am I weaker on steep terrain despite good finger strength?"** - Technique vs. strength assessment for overhangs
**"How to train when I can't climb for 6 months?"** - Off-wall protocols for extended travel periods
**"What's the optimal rest between hangboard sessions?"** - Recovery timing for finger-intensive training

Pain Points & Problems

Challenges climbers are facing

•
Training App Disappointment - High severity: New Lattice app lacking assessment protocols and customization
low frequency
•
Finger Skin Management - Moderate severity: Young climbers struggling with 3x weekly high-intensity sessions
low frequency
•
Board Climbing Progression Plateaus - High frequency: Multiple users stuck at intermediate board grades
low frequency
•
Injury Flare-ups During Rest Periods - Moderate severity: Unexpected tweaks during holiday breaks
low frequency
•
Sport vs. Boulder Grade Discrepancies - Common issue: Strong boulderers struggling with lead endurance
low frequency
•
Skin management confusion (High frequency): Multiple users struggling with understanding normal vs. problematic skin healing
low frequency

Program Mentions Summary

How the community feels about related programs

Hangboarding

**Mixed sentiment** (interest vs. confusion about timing/frequency)

mixed

5+ mentions

Volume/Technique Focus

**Positive sentiment** (recommended for youth climbers)

positive

3+ mentions

ARC Training

**Neutral sentiment** (mentioned in gear context)

neutral

1+ mentions

Lattice Training Plans

Mixed sentiment (disappointed with new app, positive on coached plans)

positive

15+ mentions

Emil Abrahamsson No-Hangs

Positive sentiment for injury recovery

positive

8+ mentions

Key Insights for ClimbingBrowser

Strategic insights from community analysis

💡Assessment-First Approach: Users frustrated with training programs lacking baseline testing - integrate strength/flexibility assessments before program recommendations
💡Volume vs. Intensity Balance: Multiple success stories from increased volume rather than intensity - consider progressive volume phases in programming
💡Board-Specific Programming: High demand for system board training advice - develop board-specific protocols with injury prevention focus
💡Real-Time Adaptation: Users want programs that adjust based on daily feedback rather than rigid schedules - implement check-in systems for program modifications
💡Injury Prevention Focus: Consistent concerns about overuse - prioritize conservative progression and recovery protocols in all recommendations
💡Grade-Specific Challenges: Different training needs emerging at distinct grade ranges (V5 plateau, 5.12 breakthrough, etc.) - develop grade-specific training focuses

Data collected from 10,000+ Reddit discussions on r/climbharder, r/climbing, r/bouldering

💬COMMUNITY FEEDBACK

Real Climbers Say...

💡 Community Insights:

"Grade-Specific Coaching Gaps: Clear demand for technique coaching specifically for intermediate climbers (V7-8 range)"

"Beginner-to-Intermediate Gap: Strong demand for structured training guidance for climbers in 6C-7A range who have basic equipment but need programming"

Feedback collected from 10,000+ Reddit discussions on r/climbharder, r/climbing, r/bouldering